Praise be to God, Lord of the worlds, and peace and blessings be upon our master Muhammad and his family and companions as follows:
   For God Almighty has swapped for every age a group of religious scholars who give news to the narrators, so that they can lie against the Sunnah of the Mustafa, who is among those who memorized Ibn Al-Mulqin, as he followed the ruler in his book Al-Badr Al-Munir in the Hadith of Al-Sharh Al-Kabeer, and our research included two topics, which we explained in the first topic: The sequels in which the teacher's son Al-Malqin disagreed, and we discussed in the second topic: the followings in which Ibn Al-Malqin agreed to rule.
   This research included important results, the most important of which are: Ibn Al-Malaqan when commenting on the narrations, and favoring each other or some narrators against each other, does not do this on the basis of a whim or a weak suspicion; He mentions the reason for the weighting that led him to that, and in most cases his tracings on others relate to attribution and judgment on narrators, or relate to the text and the authenticity of the hadith and its weakness. Often the ruler is punished by saying: “And with regard to what he said,” or “there is consideration,” a reference to his violation of the ruler in his words on the chain of transmission or his ruling on the narrators. And he has a clear method in his followings, which is that he employs the opinions of others in documenting narrators, their wounds, or in his ruling on speaking of health and weakness. And he has two paths in his followings related to attribution and speaking on narrators in which scholars disagree, whether he is against the ruler or other scholars: the first
It follows and shows the most correct, and the other: it is sufficient to convey the sayings of scholars without commenting, and this is a general approach that he used in his book Al-Badr Al-Munir. He expresses his approval of the ruler's approval in his ruling by saying: “He is what he said” indicating his agreement with his verdict on the body and the hadith in general and in general weakness.

    We can prepare what Ibn Al-Malqin was silent about, and the ruler was not commented on in it: an acknowledgment of the correctness of what the ruler went to. Ibn al-Mulqin tracked the ruler in forty-eight places in general, including those concerning attribution and speaking of narrators in thirty-one locations in which he disagreed with all of them except two places, including those concerning the text and the ruling on the hadith in general and health and weakness in general in seventeen locations he disagreed in eight places, and he agreed in Nine of them.

                                                      The two researchers
                                            Prof. Dr. Abdullah Karim Aliwi Al-Nasiri
                                           M. Sami Awad Badawi Al-Dulaimi