The study aimed to achieve the following: Developing comprehensive quality standards for evaluating the curricula of Arabic Language Departments in Colleges of Education at Iraqi universities. Evaluating the curricula of Arabic Language Departments in light of comprehensive quality standards. The study was delimited to: The Arabic language curricula—namely (grammar, morphology, literature, rhetoric, criticism, and prosody)—taught in Arabic Language Departments across their four academic years for the academic year (2010/2011). Arabic Language Departments in Colleges of Education at Iraqi universities (Baghdad, Diyala, Mosul, Basra, and Babylon). Faculty members of Arabic Language Departments in Colleges of Education at Iraqi universities. The study population consisted of faculty members of Arabic Language Departments in Colleges of Education at Iraqi universities for the academic year (2010–2011), numbering (772) instructors. The study sample comprised faculty members of Arabic Language Departments in Colleges of Education at the Iraqi universities of Baghdad, Diyala, Mosul, Basra, and Babylon, holding master’s and doctoral degrees, selected by the researcher using stratified random sampling, and representing the academic ranks of (Professor, Associate Professor, Lecturer, and Assistant Lecturer). Their number reached (300) instructors from the original population, representing (39.72%). The number of male participants was (174), accounting for (60.50%), while the number of female participants was (126), accounting for (39.49%) of the sample. The researcher prepared a special questionnaire to evaluate the curricula of Arabic Language Departments in Colleges of Education at Iraqi universities in light of comprehensive quality standards. In its initial form, it consisted of (173) items and included standards for each element and its indicators across seven domains: objectives, content, teaching methods, accompanying activities, assessment, preparation and authorship, and the language and presentation of the textbook. The questionnaire was presented to a panel of referees and experts, after which its validity, item discrimination, and reliability were verified. It was then prepared in its final form, comprising (163) items. Five response alternatives were provided for each item: (achieved to a very high degree), (achieved to a high degree), (achieved to a moderate degree), (achieved to a low degree), and (not achieved). The researcher employed the following statistical methods: Pearson’s correlation coefficient to determine the reliability coefficient of the instrument. The t-test for two independent samples to calculate the discrimination index of the questionnaire items. Weighted mean for domains, standards, and indicators. Percentage weight for domains, standards, and indicators. Chi-square to calculate the percentage of agreement among experts on the questionnaire items.