Notwithstanding the importance of international cooperation as the other facet of international interactions, a strategy of conflict resolution, a maintainer of international peace and security, its provision in the United Nations conventions, as an objective of the United Nations after the international peace and security, however, the recognition of international cooperation has not been underlined by global, intellectual think tanks. While realism emphasized on the state's role in achieving international cooperation to ensure mutual and multilateral interests, liberalism focused on the role of international organizations in building such cooperation. Additionally, constructivist approaches developed other sub-variables to contribute to the success of the state's attempts at international cooperation strategies, such as identity and social construction of the state.As long as there are conflicting interests, various strengths, different capacities, innovative roles in the world order, nations will keep seeking different patterns of bilateral and multilateral cooperation. Additionally, many countries maintain cooperation with various international representatives to ensure that their interests are realized. Thus, different patterns of cooperation divide nations into cooperative nations, those which maintain contact with international organizations and powers, and non-cooperative nations.There are many non-cooperative countries, particularly those that maintain no contact with the United Nations on several issues. Such non-cooperative countries often cite the rejection of unilateral hegemony over the world order, they are in relevant alliances, or the very nature of these countries' roles in conflicts that underpin them regionally or internationally, as in the case of North Korea. Given these varying patterns of cooperation and alliance, the United Nations, the Security Council, the International Atomic Energy Agency (as an authority in North Korea's nuclear crisis, which poses a direct threat to international peace and security), and the other international actors are obliged to take different techniques of negotiation that vary with respect to phases, talks, and tactics.It is worth mentioning that North Korean nuclear program is a threat to international balances on which East Asia's security, regional stability, and the world order rely. Owing to these considerations, this paper examines international cooperation, draws on theoretical backgrounds to define negotiating strategies, and elaborates on the international tactics taken by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Security Council, the United States of America, Russia, and China to help resolve North Korea's nuclear program.